PLANT PORN WINS BOOKER PRIZE

...was the headline in Swedish newspapers when The Vegetarian won the Booker last year. Not that all those papers had read the book, obviously, quite the contrary (though it will be out in Swedish in a month or so, but sadly translated from the excellent English translation rather than from Korean, which is a whole other thing). But someone at the news agency spent five seconds reading a synopsis of the book and learned that there was a sex scene and that there was a woman transforming herself into a tree, drew his (or possibly her, but let's play the odds) own conclusions about what the book might contain, put a click-friendly headline on it and put it out there, and all the newspapers who hadn't read the book reprinted the item as it was. And hey presto, Han Kang was now a vegetable pornographer without anyone having asked her about it.

"I had a dream."

There's a metaphor in that which works rather deliciously for this story about a woman whom nobody has asked about, well, anything, ever. Her decision to stop eating meat, then to stop eating altogether, and then to stop being a woman (with all that that entails in a world not run by women) has an explanation, but whenever she (at first) tries to explain it, nobody's interested. Look at how she's embarrassing her husband, her father, her family. Why can't she just be NORMAL? Kill things and eat them. Take your place in the chain of violence inherent in the system. Be something we can classify.

"I'm tired... I said I'm really tired."
"Just put up with it for a minute," he said.

The Vegetarian, of course, is neither plant nor porn. It may well be perverse, but that's another thing entirely. Like a feminist Cronenberg adapting Bartleby The Scrivener (and it is very cinematic despite its short length), she tracks Yeong-hye's gradual descent or ascent (whichever it might be) through the eyes of others - her husband, her brother-in-law, her sister - but never letting the reader in on the answer, letting them draw their own conclusions. I'm still not sure what mine are, I'll have to mull this over. But damn.


ETA 17/1/26:
Two thoughts after seeing Han Kang talk about this and Human Acts tonight:
1) She talks a lot about acts as defining who people are - the title of the latter novel is not hers but her English editor's, but it really suits her.
2) When asked about Yeong-hye's motivations and whether she's insane or just too sane, she stresses that there's a reason she never gives us Yeong-hye's POV, but just those of three people close (or at least near) to her; much like they project their reactions onto Yeong-hye's choice to NOT, she forces the reader to do the same thing. My reaction: Damn, she makes me as a reader complicit in the violence against a character who wants to categorically reject all violence - even the violence of having to put her decision into words, into explanations that can be accepted.

ETA 25/08/22: The idea of refusing the violence of society? How does one NOT be a human? What actions can one take to get out of it? What does the dream mean? How does each new novella build on the previous - do we understand more or less by the end than we did by the first third?